Doctors as a Commodity: the Ruin of Modern Medicine?

Did you ever wonder why doctors are reimbursed on the same fee schedule regardless of their experience, qualifications, knowledge, expertise, or interpersonal skills? Why is it that lawyers, teachers, businesspeople, military personnel, hospital administrators, and virtually every other person in our nation is reimbursed for his or her services on the basis of qualifications and experience, yet physicians – arguably the most highly trained group of the lot – are not? Examine this hypothetical (yet common) scenario. Joe Thomson graduates at the bottom of his medical school class and then completes training in a sub-par general surgery residency. His parents, though not highly educated, are very wealthy – they earned their fortune flipping houses in the early 2000’s. Because of an unforeseen turn of events, they were forced to sell their house-flipping empire just before the market crashed. Fortune indeed smiled upon them. Not having benefited from higher education, they had always had high aspirations for their only son. And so when Dr. Joe was at long last a licensed general surgeon, his parents wanted him to practice in the finest locale. They rented a beautiful Brownstone in Manhattan just across from the most highly regarded general surgeon in the city. And, they employed their marketing skills to spread the word about their up and coming son. Shortly after opening his practice he was called to the Emergency Room to care for a patient who required an extraordinarily complex surgery. This particular surgery is long, intricate, and carries a very high complication rate. Given the mandatory call system in his hospital, it was however the young surgeon’s turn to be “up at bat.” The accomplished surgeon across the street had already done well over 100 of these surgeries while our young doctor had yet to perform a single one on his own. (He had assisted in 3 during his five-year residency).

There are two issues to consider here. First, indisputably the unwitting patient would be better served with the far more experienced surgeon.

Second, both surgeons – one with no experience while the other a veritable expert – will be reimbursed exactly the same for this very difficult operation. You see, the doctors are a commodity – pork bellies, concrete, orange juice etc. Their skills are ostensibly indistinguishable and therefore interchangeable. Now imagine you’re the patient. Which doctor would you choose? If given the opportunity (which you don’t have under current insurance restrictions) would you pay more for one over the other? I know whom I’d choose, even if I had to take out a loan, skip vacations, work extra hours and the like. Here’s an added irony. The experienced doctor is on faculty at a medical school. His hard-earned skills are so great that a competing private hospital purchases his practice (and him), thereby increasing his income three fold. In sum, in order to make more money he left his position at the academic institution where he had used his superior skills to train young doctors. Within two years he becomes so highly respected at the new hospital that he’s advanced further, to the position of hospital CEO. Now he truly earns a hefty income. But, he no longer practices medicine. To “get ahead” monetarily, he had to leave the pool of expert practicing clinicians whose sole purpose is to help patients. To earn more money, our great surgeon had to stop doing surgery. He had to become an administrator.

I know it is considered indecorous for doctors to be concerned about money, but when our incomes fall while expenses rise; when we find it difficult to put our children through college or save enough money for retirement; when we cannot foresee how we will ever repay our college and medical school loans; when we lose our voice in how we are compensated; we have no choice but to become “normal” people and consider our incomes and how to best maintain and even grow them. In truth there is nothing inherently wrong with physicians’ focusing some attention on how much money they earn. In the past though doctors earned enough so as to not care about reimbursement. Their financial contentment yielded great dividends; they devoted all their free time to bettering themselves as physicians. They devoured journals and took medical courses; attended meetings and discussed interesting cases with their colleagues. Though some physicians still practice in this vein, many do not. Instead, most doctors today read Medical Economics and The Wall Street Journal, watch financial news on television, read books about alternate methods to make money, and carefully plan their premature exit strategies from the practice of medicine. The state of Medicine today is nothing short of depressing.

Non-physicians probably won’t want to hear what I’m saying. They might quip that doctors should be above money or that doctors make more than “enough” as it is. Be that as it may, the reality is that as a consequence of changes in medical economics as well as an explosion in the bureaucracy involved in private practice, many of the up and coming “best and brightest” are flocking to finance and business, and away from medicine. And that will leave us all at a distinct disadvantage when we seek and require top quality doctors down the road. Like it or not if we hope to bring back the doctors of yesteryear, we must face facts and acknowledge why so many doctors today are unhappy. We must identify what it will take to rejuvenate the medical field, and make it once again an enticing and challenging goal to which our young will aspire.

Learn more about preventive cardiology at www.preventivecardiologyinc.com.

For more information more about essential vitamins and supplements visit www.vitalremedymd.com.

Tags: , ,

One Comment

  1. Brian Edwards January 28, 2015 at 4:33 am #

    Quick answer: Medicine should not be path to being rich. It is a path to helping people in a field of study one finds fascinating.

    Long answer:
    1- Most expensive surgeon is often not the best surgeon.
    2- Most financially successful surgeon often does unnecessary surgery. See BARI 2 and COURAGE trials. See President’s Bush’s and Supreme Court Justice Ginsberg recent stents.
    3- Going to Cleveland Clinic sounds great till you realize
    Dr. Oz is a cardiovascular surgeon on staff.
    4- Reputations are poorly earned when they are too good to be true as with Bernie Madoff.
    5- Lawyers are much the same. I don’t think physicians want to be classed with them for financial purposes.

    My 30 yo son is a first year medical student. I met several of his fellow students. I was immensely impressed by their commitment to hard studies in the age of Obamacare.

    Their first concern was to become great Doctors, not rich Doctors.

    My concern is not that great Doctors are underpaid. My concern is getting health care to everyone.

    Quote below is from:
    https://docs.google.com/document/d/17n_Wx50FMggP03EIOr2aW-45It8JVH5vx5VteDieyM4/edit

    “What’s more, the CBO also found that the Affordable Care Act has brought coverage to 12 million Americans – a total that will continue to grow steadily in the coming years – and the uninsured rate is expected to drop to just 8% by the end of President Obama’s tenure.

    Of course, 8% isn’t 0%, and that would still leave many people in this country without coverage, but according to the CBO, nearly all of those folks would be either undocumented immigrants, ineligible for benefits under the reform law, or low-income families living in red states that refuse to accept Medicaid expansion – a problem the White House cannot solve.”

    I have been paying 4% more income tax to pay for Obamacare. It did not affect my lifestyle.

    Lets get the red states to expand Medicaid, not worry about millionaire Doctors.

    The number of Echocardiograms, Nuclear Stress tests, stents and bypasses we do for money rather than cheap screening with CAC and CIMT to obviate the expensive late procedures with early diagnosis and early generic medical treatment is ludicrous.

Post Comment